Explanation | A gap warning is reported if a value or a range of values for one condition is not explicitly tested in a decision entity or a rule set. |
Example |  A gap warning is reported, because the value = 5,000 is not tested for the condition Order value. |
Action | If the gap is not intended, specify the missing value or range of values for the condition. |
Explanation | An overlap warning is reported if the same value or range of values for one condition is tested multiple times in a decision entity or a rule set. |
Example |  An overlap warning is reported, because the value = 5,000 is tested multiple times for the condition Order value. |
Action | If the overlap is not intended, modify the rules so that the condition value is only tested once. |
Explanation | A syntax warning is for instance reported if data is lost due to truncation. |
Example |  A syntax warning is reported, because a result value of the data type long is assigned to a result of the data type byte and is therefore truncated. |
Action | If the data loss is not tolerable, assign a value of the correct data type. |
Explanation | An empty cell warning is reported if a condition value or a result value is not specified. |
Example |  An empty cell warning is reported, because the condition value for the first rule is not specified. |
Action | If the empty cell is not intended, specify the missing value. |
Explanation | A processing mode warning is reported if the processing mode of a decision table within a rule set differs from the processing mode of this rule set, because the processing mode of the rule set overwrites that of the decision table. |
Example | Differences in processing modes can occur if you add an inferential decision table to a sequential rule set or vice versa; or if you modify the processing mode of a rule set or of a decision table within this rule set. |
Action | If the different processing mode is not intended, set the same processing mode for the decision table and rule set. |
Explanation | A redundancy warning is reported if parts of one rule, or rules of one decision table, or rules of several decision tables within one rule set are dispensable. |
Example |  A redundancy warning is reported, because as in the first rule no value is specified for the condition Country, any value applies to this rule. This makes the second rule superfluous. |
Action | If the redundancy is not intended, delete the dispensable rules or parts of rules. |
Explanation | A missing rule warning is reported if a probable combination of conditions is not explicitly tested in a decision entity or a rule set. |
Example |  A missing rule warning is reported, because the condition combination gender=female AND olderThan45=false is not explicitly tested. |
Action | If the missing rule is not intended, specify the missing combination(s) of conditions. |
Explanation | Verification results for preconfigured verification services, see Working with a Preconfigured Verification Service. |
Explanation | All warnings and errors that do not fit into the other categories. |